International Law Essays - International Trade, International Law

International Law International law is the body of legal rules that apply between sovereign states and such other entities as have been granted international personality (status acknowledged by the international community). The rules of international law are of a normative character, that is, they prescribe towards conduct, and are potentially designed for authoritative interpretation by an international judicial authority and by being capable of enforcement by the application of external sanctions. The International Court of Justice is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations, which succeeded the Permanent Court of International Justice after World War II. Article 92 of the charter of the United Nations states: The International Court of justice shall be the principal judicial organ of the United nations. It shall function in accordance with the annexed Statute, which is based upon the Statute of the Permanent court of International Justice and forms an integral part of the present Charter. The commands of international law must be those that the states impose upon themselves, as states must give consent to the commands that they will follow. It is a direct expression of raison d'etat, the "interests of the state", and aims to serve the state, as well as protect the state by giving its rights and duties. This is done through treaties and other consensual engagements which are legally binding. The case-law of the ICJ is an important aspect of the UN's contribution to the development of international law. It's judgements and advisory opinions permeates into the international legal community not only through its decisions as such but through the wider implications of its methodology and reasoning. The successful resolution of the border dispute between Burkina Faso and Mali in the 1986 Frontier Dispute case illustrates the utility of judicial decision as a means of settlement in territorial disputes. The case was submitted to a Chamber of the ICJ pursuant to a special agreement concluded by the parties in 1983. In December 1985, while written submissions were being prepared, hostilities broke out in the disputed area. A cease-fire was agreed, and the Chamber directed the continued observance of the cease-fire, the withdrawal of troops within twenty days, and the avoidance of actions tending to aggravate the dispute or prejudice its eventual resolution. Both Presidents publicly welcomed the judgement and indicated their intention to comply with it. In the Fisheries Jurisdiction case (United Kingdom v. Iceland , 1974) the ICJ contributed to the firm establishment in law of the idea that mankind needs to conserve the living resources of the sea and must respect these resources. T he Court observed: It is one of the advances in maritime international law, resulting from the intensification of fishing, that the former laissez-faire treatment ofthe living resources of the sea in the high seas has been replaced by a recognition of a duty to have due regard of the rights of other States and the needs of conservation for the benefit of all. Consequently, both parties have the obligation to keep inder review the fishery resources in the disputed waters and to examine together, in the light of scientific and other available information, the measures required for the conservation and development, and equitable exploitation, of these resources, taking into account any international agreement in force between them, such as the North-East Atlantic Fisheries Convention of 24 January 1959, as well as such other agreements as may be reached in the matter in the course of further negotiation. The Court also held that the concept of preferential rights in fisheries is not static. This is not to say that the preferential rights of a coastal State in a special situation are a static concept, in the sense that the degree of the coastal State's preference is to be considered as for ever at some given moment. On the contrary, the preferential rights are a function of the exceptional dependence of such a coastal State on the fisheries in adjacent waters and may, therefore, vary as the extent of that dependence changes. The Court's judgement on this case contributes to the development of the law of the sea by recognizing the concept of the preferential rights of a coastal state in the fisheries of the adjacent waters, particularly if that state is in

Tips to Get Your Feedback Draft Essay Done Properly

Tips to Get Your Feedback Draft Essay Done ProperlyOne of the things that I am going to cover here in this article is the key to getting your feedback draft essay completed properly. This is something that can be a bit of a process, but with a few tips, you will have no problem at all.Before anything else, it is essential that you get a few feedback drafts of your own before you start this project. You don't want to get these totally wrong and not see how they feel about your work. Instead, get one or two and then reread them again until you have their thoughts.In order to keep this from being a headache, make sure that you make copies of the feedback drafts of your own essay. There are a number of ways to do this, but one that I like to use is to make a folder for each draft and label it as such. Then you can just take the ones that you like the best and cut them up and stick them into a folder. The best part about this process is that you will see what works and what doesn't, and t herefore make it easier to edit later on.Another great way to get your initial draft done is to turn it into a mini-outline. When I do this, I write the first two thirds of my essay as an outline, the second third as a developing outline, and the last third as a completed outline. Now you will be able to fill in any missing information and continue writing the rest of the essay yourself.You should also make sure that you have a few pieces of paper that you go through and cut and rewrite any ideas that you come across in your feedback draft. For instance, there could be a section in your assignment where you need to present a short personal story. Write that into your essay and then come back and revise it a few times in order to see if you want to move it into the next draft.Remember that when you are trying to improve your essay, you need to continually tweak your feedback draft. This is what will help you to see the problems and flaws that you need to correct in order to complete your project successfully.While it is always a good idea to discuss your idea with someone, it is sometimes best to get feedback completely from your own heart. Don't listen to what someone else has to say unless you think that you can handle it well. There are often plenty of people who will be willing to help you out if you ask.So there you have it, the key to getting your feedback draft essay finished is to follow the tips I mentioned here, and then you can get a great sense of accomplishment after completing your assignment. After all, no one is ever going to be able to understand your project if you don't finish it.